IVAN VAN SERTIMA THESIS

This paradigm dominates in science and public opinion ever since. Van Sertima made several huge mistakes in his book, which when examined completely unravel his narrative of contact between the Old World and New World. By Bernard Ortiz de Montellano. His book, while attempting to create a narrative favorable to his targeted audience, only serves to further the stigmatization of indigenous Americans under a White supremacist model by stealing their identity and history – thus robbing them of their accomplishments and contributions to human civilization. The second piece of evidence, included in the book concerns comparison of religious customs of Africans and Americans.

When examining the statements made by Van Sertima it is clear that the arguments posed by his book follow the pattern of all pseudoscientific stories, in that the claims cannot be supported by any evidence found in the historical, archeological, or linguistic record. No such comparisons have ever been found or mentioned. The Olmec people belonged to the Mixe-Zoque language family while their name comes from the completely separate Uto-Aztecan language family. Remember me on this computer. This is exemplified by the examples given with the misusage of the Olmec name and misunderstanding of the biological science of the human nose. The writing system in Nubian was generally the same as that of the ancient Egyptians, as they borrowed cultural concepts from each other periodically; the common writing systems were hieroglyphic, hieratic, and demotic. Unfortunately for the hypothesis floated by Van Sertima, nothing could be further from the truth.

The second piece of evidence, included in the book concerns comparison of religious customs of Africans and Americans. The writing system in Nubian was generally the same as that of the ancient Egyptians, as they borrowed cultural concepts from each other periodically; the common writing systems were hieroglyphic, hieratic, and demotic.

ivan van sertima thesis

Another crucial mistake made by Van Sertima relates to the detail pointed out earlier in this essay regarding the Olmec name Van,p.

A priest, Fray Gregoria Garcia wrote an account of another encounter in a book that was silenced by the inquisition: Hieroglyphs was used for ceremonial purposes in terms of temple decorations, etc. One of the ways to prove that a certain group of people existed in a theiss location or are related to a particular group is genetic evidence.

  SRVUSD HOMEWORK POLICY

The issues that exist with both arguments are inherent in the methods used to assert them and even the logic used to support them. History, as taught in the Western and Western-dominated world, provides a thesis, that America has been definitely discovered by Europeans, and the first people to reach it serrtima the ancestries ivqn Indians settled there were Spanish under Columbus inor at least Vikings about A.

ivan van sertima thesis

Robbing Native American Esrtima Instead of making the basis of the discussion on the topic about the verifiable facts, the mystical qualities of a story, appeal of the unknown, and often the struggle -real or imagined- between the authors and supporters of the mythos and the academic establishment take precedence.

He is the Editor of the Journal of African Civilizations, which he founded in and has published several major anthologies which have influenced the development of multicultural curriculum in the United States.

For instance the Phoenician writing system while derived from Egyptian hieroglyphs, had an alphabet of 22 symbols and is considered the basis for modern Latin writing symbols.

Dr. Ivan Van Sertima

In Africa there exist a Bambara werewolf cult whose head is known as amantigi heads of faith appeared in Mexican rituals as amanteca. He eertima also asked by Congress to appear before a Congressional Committee on July 7, to challenge the Columbus myth.

Van Sertima argues that various African populations visited the American continents several times throughout history bringing culture, technology, architectural improvements, and various sophistications that did not previously exist among these American peoples. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper?

Ivan Van Sertima’s They Came Before Columbus:&nbspBook Review

Van Sertima attempts to accomplish several different goals, with a new twist. How about make it original? Even the architecture of the Olmec people would have mirrored that of Nubia in some fashion. In a sense, they can continue to subscribe to the beliefs that they gained through slavery and colonialism – such as Christianity or Islam – without having to worry about rationalizing continuing to follow the ideology of their captors and enslavers.

This relation would have carried on into the building traditions of the later empire of the Toltec people, and then the more contemporary Maya and Aztec empires whose people and culture exist today in the millions.

  SHOW MY HOMEWORK KJS

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. Ancient relations between Can and Mexicans.

ivan van sertima thesis

These anthologies include Blacks in Science: Another issue regarding language was the writing system, another detail that Van Sertima and the Afrocentrists have skimmed over. The pseudo-scientific concept that will be discussed in this review is the narrative created by Ivan Van Sertima regarding the Mesoamerican eertima – in particular the Olmec peoples – and the purported link to the African continent before the advent of European incursion on the American continents.

If humanity were studied in its entirety, then it becomes clear that the concept of race is PURELY a cultural construct. Casanova Escobano In an attempt to give a different and more egalitarian perspective to American history — and world history by association — Ivan Van Sertima attempts to recreate a lost world using artifacts, linguistic examples, and various comparisons of the myths of Africa and Mesoamerica.

Evidence from anthropological genetics. The difference between the Eurocentric model and the Afrocentric model used by Van Sertima is that the former is used by the dominant ethnic group as a method of furthering their concepts of cultural dominance while the latter is espoused by members of a similarly marginalized ethnic group with the express intention of competing with Eurocentric ideals of racial superiority.

It was a name given to them by the Nahuatl speaking Aztec people, who came over years after this civilization fell, who named them the Olmecs based on who their historians knew from their own history and from what they discovered in the ruins of the long abandoned thewis.

Accessed May 22, There are several problems with the claims made by Van Sertima that are problematic, the least of them not being the usurping of Native American history in vna to prove racial superiority. But the whole notion of any race European, African or American discovering a full-blown civilization is absurd. The third proof of the book are archeological evidences of African presence in America in pre-Colombian times.